Main authors: | Lúcia Barão and Gottlieb Basch |
Editor: | Jane Brandt |
Source document: | Barão, L. and Basch, G. (2017) Selection of sites for testing "soil improving" measures. iSQAPER Project Milestone 6.1 26 pp |
In »Effect of management practices on soil quality in case study sites we describe how, across all 14 iSQAPER case study sites, we selected 132 sets of paired control and AMP plots in which either single or combinations of agricultural management practices were being used and we measured their impact on soil quality by making visual soil assessments.
Here we describe how we selected a sub-set of those 132 pairs as experimental sites in which we to looked at in more detail at those impacts in two field campaigns.
Contents table |
1. Characterization of experimental sites using innovative AMPs |
2. Criteria for selection of experimental sites |
1. Characterization of experimental sites using innovative AMPs
The iSQAPER case study sites were asked to identify and collect information from farms located in their study area with plots where innovative agricultural management practices (AMPs) are being used by the farmers. In order to get a representative sample, the study sites were asked to apply the following criteria in their selection:
- include the 2 main different farming systems of the study area;
- include at least 2 different soil types in their climatic region;
- include at least 3 different AMPs (or combinations of AMPs).
Also, control plots for every innovative AMP plot were identified by the study sites. Control plots are plots with the same soil type, farming system and similar in every other way, except for the presence of the innovative AMP.
Farming systems
The case study sites were requested to identify plots with one of these three farming systems:
- arable land,
- permanent crops and
- pastures
and to select plots representative of the two main dominant farming systems of the study area.
The details of types of farming system within these three broad categories were based on the list described in »Farming system classification in the iSQAPER project. Minor changes were introduced to face the real conditions identified by the study sites during their selection (Table 1).
Table 1 Farming systems classification used during the identification of farms/plots with innovative AMP’s
Farming system | ||
1. Arable Land | 1.1 Non-irrigated arable Land |
1.1.1 Cereals |
1.2 Permanently irrigated arable Land | 1.2.1 Cereals 1.2.2 Maize 1.2.3 Legumes 1.2.4 Oil crops 1.2.5 Fodder crops 1.2.6 Root crop 1.2.7 Fallow 1.2.8 Flowers, fruits and vegetables |
|
2. Permanent crops | 2.1 Vineyards 2.2 Fruit trees and berry plantation 2.3 Oil groves |
|
3. Pastures | 3.1 Extensive 3.2 Intensive |
Pedo-climatic zones
The distribution of case study sites (CSSs) covers 6 climatic zones in Europe and 2 in China (Table 2).
Table 2. CSSs per climatic zone in Europe and China.
Europe | China | ||||||
Atlantic | Mediterranean temperate | Mediterranean semi-arid | Southern Sub-Continental | Northern Sub-Continental | Boreal to Sub-Boreal | Central Asia Tropical Zone | Middle Temperate Zone |
Netherlands (CSS1) France (CSS2) |
Portugal (CSS3) Greece (CSS5) |
Spain (CSS4) |
Slovenia (CSS6) Hungary (CSS7) |
Romania (CSS8) Poland (CSS9) |
Estonia (CSS10) |
Qiyang (CSS11) Suining (CSS12) |
Gongzhuling (CSS14) |
The major pedoclimatic zones were defined by Tóth et al. (2016) and embody the soil processes that prevail at these climatic regions.
A total of 8 climatic groups were defined in Europe (»Pedoclimatic zones of Europe) (Figure 1) :
- Boreal to Sub-Boreal (CZ1), Atlantic (CZ2), Sub-oceanic (CZ3) Northern sub-continental (CZ4), Mediterranean semi-arid (CZ5), Southern sub-continental, (CZ6), Mediterranean (temperate and sub-oceanic) (CZ7) and Temperate mountainous (CZ8).
For China, a total of 10 climatic groups were defined (»Pedoclimatic zones of China) (Figure 2):
- Tropical zone; Southern Asia tropical zone; Central Asia tropical zone; Northern Asia tropical zone; Warm temperate zone; Plateau temperate zone; Plateau artic zone; Plateau sub-arctic zone; Middle temperate zone; Cold temperate zone.
Figure 1
Figure 2
The case study sites selected plots in the most commonly occurring soil types in their areas. In Europe, the most common soils are Cambisols which are found in all climatic regions except in the Boreal to Sub-Boreal. Chernozems are found only in Northern and Southern Sub-continental regions, Regosols only in Mediterranean Temperate and Semi-arid and Histosols are found only in Boreal to Sub-Boreal (Figure 3, data from »Pedoclimatic zones of Europe).
Figure 3
Innovative AMPs and soil threats
Based on WOCAT database (www.wocat.net), 18 promising AMPs with potential to improve soil quality were selected, taking into accound the most frequently used practices by farmers nowadays to face their current problems (Schwilch et al., 2011) (see also »Experimental framework).
These 18 innovative AMPs can be grouped into 5 different management strategies:
- Soil management
- Nutrient management
- Water management
- Pest management and
- Crop management and land use change
Table 3 includes a brief description of the AMPs, expected impacts/ecological benefits of using them and the main soil threat targeted, ranked by order of relevance (where 1 is considered the most relevant).
- Erosion,
- Soil organic matter (SOM) decline,
- Compaction,
- Poor structure,
- Poor water holding capacity,
- Nitrate leaching,
- Soil-borne pests and diseases
- Salinization
Additionally, each case study site ranked the soil threats in their local area (**see also »Soil threats). The idea is to link, at a later stage, the impact of a given AMP on soil quality and the major soil threats affecting the area.
Table 3. Promising AMPs considered, description, expected impacts/ecological benefits and the corresponding main soil threat targeted by its use (WOCAT, (Schwilch et al., 2011))
AMP list | AMP description | Expected impacts / Ecological benefits | Main soil threat targeted | |
Soil management | ||||
1 | No tillage (no-till) | A system where crops are planted into the soil without primary tillage |
|
|
2 | Minimum tillage (min-till) | Tillage operation with: a) reduced tillage depth; b) strip tillage; c) mulch tillage; or or a combination thereof |
|
|
3 | Permanent soil cover / Removing less vegetation cover | Avoiding a bare or sparsely covered soil exposed to weather conditions (rain, wind, radiation, etc) by ensuring a permanent cover (at least 30% of the soil surface) throughout the year, e.g. through cutting less grass, leaving a volunteer crop or crop residues, etc. (see also cover crops and residue maintenance / mulching) |
|
|
4 | Cover crops |
|
|
|
5 | Residue maintenance / Mulching | Maintaining crops residues or spreading of organic (or other) materials on the soil surface. |
|
|
6 | Cross-slope measure | Structural measure along the contour to break slope lengths, such as terraces, bunds, grass strip, trashlines, contour tillage | Reduces surface runoff and erosion (increase infiltration capacity). |
|
7 | Measures against compaction |
|
a-b) Looses soil to improve drainage, infiltration, aeration and rooting characteristics, and brings nutrients up from deep below c-d) Minimizes soil damage and preserves soil function in terms of water infiltration, drainage and greenhouse gas mitigation, and (d) provides useful information for decision making process for site-specific applications such as variable deep tillage to benefit from increased timeliness (and reduced management costs) |
|
Nutrient management | ||||
8 | Leguminous crop | A leguminous crop is a plant in the family Fabaceae (or Leguminosae) that is grown agriculturally, primarily for their grain seed called pulse, for livestock forage and silage, and as soil-enhancing green manure. Well-known legumes include alfalfa, clover, peas, beans, lentils, lupins, mesquite, carob, soybeans, peanuts, and tamarind. |
|
|
9 | Green manure / Integrated soil fertility management | Green manure is a crop grown to be incorporated into the ground, while the more general term ‘integrated soil fertility management’ refers to a mix of organic and inorganic materials, used with close attention to context-specific timing and placing of the inputs in order to maximize the agronomic efficiency. |
|
|
10 | Manuring (a) / composting (b) |
|
|
|
Pest management | ||||
11 | Crop rotation (a) / Control or change of species composition (b) | Practice of alternating the annual crops grown on a specific field in a planned pattern or sequence in successive crop years so that crops of the same species or family are not grown repeatedly on the same field Diversify species in rotation systems or grasslands. |
a) Reduces risk of pest and weed infestations.
b) Introduces desired / new species, reduces invasive species, controls burning, residue burning. |
|
12 | Integrated pest and disease management incl. organic agriculture | Appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to reduce or minimize risks to human health and the environment. |
|
|
Water management | ||||
13 | Water diversion and drainage | A graded channel with a supportive ridge or bank on the lower side. It is constructed across a slope to intercept surface runoff and convey it safely to an outlet or waterway |
|
|
14 | Irrigation management | Controlled water supply and drainage: mixed rainfed – irrigated; full irrigation; drip irrigation |
|
|
Crop management | ||||
15 | Major change in timing of activities | Adaptation of the timing of land preparation, planting, cutting of vegetation according weather and climatic conditions, vegetation growth, etc. |
|
|
16 | Layout change according to natural and human environment/needs | eg exclusion of natural waterways and hazardous areas, separation of grazing types; increase of landscape diversity. |
|
|
17 | Area closure / rotational grazing | Complete or temporal stop of use to support restoration |
|
|
18 | Change of land use practices / intensity level | eg change from grazing to cutting (for stall feeding), from continuous cropping to managed fallow, from random (open access) to controlled access (grazing land), from herding to fencing, adjusting stocking rates. |
|
|